Earl E. Cloud, Jr. and Sheila S. Cloud - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          Addition to Tax for Failure To File Timely Tax Returns                      
               Unless shown to be for reasonable cause and not due to                 
          willful neglect, failure to file a return on the due date                   
          generally results in an addition to tax in the amount of 5                  
          percent for each month during which such failure continues, but             
          not exceeding 25 percent in the aggregate.  See sec. 6651(a)(1).            
               Petitioners’ 1988 Federal income tax return was due                    
          April 17, 1989.  It was filed February 15, 1991.  Petitioners’              
          1989 Federal income tax return was due April 16, 1990.  It was              
          also filed February 15, 1991.                                               
               Neither at trial nor on brief have petitioners specifically            
          addressed respondent’s determination that they are liable for               
          the section 6651(a) addition to tax.  Petitioner testified that             
          petitioners had suffered several misfortunes.  He testified that            
          his law partner was murdered and that petitioner wife was                   
          frequently ill, necessitating numerous trips to the Mayo Clinic.            
          Petitioners’ return preparer testified, however, that the murder            
          occurred in 1980 and that the Mayo Clinic trips were more recent            
          than the years at issue.  The scant evidence in the record fails            
          to establish any clear nexus between these misfortunes and                  
          petitioners’ failure to file timely Federal income tax returns.             
               Petitioner also testified that he was busier than usual                
          with his law practice, in part because his father, who was also             
          petitioner’s law partner, had undergone open-heart surgery.                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011