Compaq Computer Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         

          Other Taxes, Apr. 29, 1948, U.S.-Neth., art. VII, para. 1, 62               
          Stat. 1757, 1761.  The withholding payment equaled 15 percent of            
          the declared dividend, $3,381,870.  Accordingly, a net dividend             
          of $19,163,930 was deposited into petitioner's margin account at            
          Bear Stearns and wired to petitioner on October 2, 1992.                    
               On its 1992 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported             
          the loss on the purchase and resale of Royal Dutch ADR's as a               
          short-term capital loss in the amount of $20,652,816, calculated            
          as follows:                                                                 
                         Adjusted basis      $888,535,869                             
                         Amount realized      867,883,053                             
                         Capital loss        $ 20,652,816                             
          Petitioner also reported dividend income in the amount of                   
          $22,546,800 and claimed a foreign tax credit of $3,382,050 for              
          the income tax withheld and paid to the Netherlands Government              
          with respect to the dividend.                                               
                              ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT                               
               Every aspect of petitioner's ADR transaction was                       
          deliberately predetermined and designed by petitioner and                   
          Twenty-First to yield a specific result and to eliminate all                
          economic risks and influences from outside market forces on the             
          purchases and sales in the ADR transaction.                                 
               Petitioner had no reasonable possibility of a profit from              
          the ADR transaction without the anticipated Federal income tax              
          consequences.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011