- 15 - While asserting that it made a "real" payment to the Netherlands in the form of the $3,381,870 withheld tax, petitioner contends that that withholding tax should be disregarded in determining the U.S. tax effect of the transaction and the economic substance of the transaction. Respondent, however, persuasively demonstrates that petitioner would incur a prearranged economic loss from the transaction but for the foreign tax credit. The following cash-flow analysis demonstrates the inevitable economic detriment to petitioner from engaging in the ADR transaction: Cash-flow from ADR transaction: ADR purchase trades ($887,577,129) ADR sale trades 868,412,129 Net cash from ADR transaction ($19,165,000) Cash-flow from dividend: Gross dividend 22,545,800 Netherlands withholding tax (3,381,870) Net cash from dividend 19,163,930 OFFSETTING CASH-FLOW RESIDUAL (1,070) Cash-flow from transaction costs: Commissions (1,000,000) Less: Adjustment 1,071 SEC fees (28,947) Margin writeoff 37 Interest (457,846) Net cash from transaction costs (1,485,685) NET ECONOMIC LOSS ($1,486,755) The cash-flow deficit arising from the transaction, prior to use of the foreign tax credit, was predetermined by the careful andPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011