- 26 -
taxpayer are relevant to determining fraudulent intent. See
Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 211 (1992); Stephenson
v. Commissioner, supra at 1006; Iley v. Commissioner, 19 T.C.
631, 635 (1952).
Over the years, courts have developed a nonexclusive list of
factors that demonstrate fraudulent intent. These badges of
fraud include: (1) Understating income, (2) maintaining
inadequate records, (3) implausible or inconsistent explanations
of behavior, (4) concealment of income or assets, (5) failing to
cooperate with tax authorities, (6) engaging in illegal
activities, (7) an intent to mislead which may be inferred from a
pattern of conduct, (8) lack of credibility of the taxpayer's
testimony, (9) filing false documents, (10) failing to file tax
returns, and (11) dealing in cash. See Spies v. United States,
supra at 499; Douge v. Commissioner, 899 F.2d 164, 168 (2d Cir.
1990); Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-308 (9th Cir.
1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601; Recklitis v. Commissioner, 91
T.C. 874, 910 (1988). Although no single factor is necessarily
sufficient to establish fraud, the combination of a number of
factors constitutes persuasive evidence. See Solomon v.
Commissioner, 732 F.2d 1459, 1461 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. per
curiam T.C. Memo. 1982-603. We note that some conduct and
evidence can be classified under more than one factor.
Page: Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011