S. Robert Davis - Page 33




                                       - 33 -                                         

          which respondent contends shows that the transaction was a sale.            
          We disagree.                                                                
               Ms. Blair maintained this ledger.  The ledger contained a              
          page captioned "S. Robert Davis - Strata".  Ms. Blair testified             
          that the purpose of this page was to keep track of how much                 
          Strata stock Mr. Davis owned.  She further testified that she               
          made the entries in the ledger referencing the transfer of                  
          100,000 shares of Strata stock to Mr. Walker and that the                   
          transfer was not a sale of stock.  Ms. Blair was credible, and              
          her testimony corroborates Mr. Davis' testimony.                            
               Furthermore, Mr. Davis testified that he was always                    
          promoting companies and that he made a practice of giving stock             
          to people or investors in order to encourage them to send other             
          investors to him or to keep them as investors.  Mr. Walker was an           
          important investor and a source of investors, and we believe that           
          Mr. Davis made the gift to Mr. Walker in order to keep Mr. Walker           
          as a potential future investor and source of potential future               
          investors.  Additionally, there is no evidence that petitioner              
          received any money from Mr. Walker for the Strata stock.                    
               H.   ODC                                                               
               Respondent claims that petitioner fraudulently overstated              
          the value of the Strata stock he donated to ODC.  Respondent                
          argues that the stock was unregistered, and petitioner's claimed            
          deduction was based on the registered, traded, asked price.                 





Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011