- 2 - Petitioners moved the Court for an award of litigation costs only. Accordingly, all costs claimed by petitioners are in connection with the filing of the petition and thereafter. Neither party requested a hearing. The relevant facts are taken from the record. See Rule 232(a). General Background The petition in the underlying case was filed on January 13, 1997. Respondent's answer was filed on March 4, 1997. A trial was held on February 11, 1998, in San Francisco, California. The sole issue at trial was whether petitioners engaged in their horse breeding and horse racing activities with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of section 183. We filed our Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion on November 10, 1998, holding that decision would be entered for petitioners. See Dishal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-397. Respondent concedes that petitioners filed a timely motion for award of reasonable litigation costs, substantially prevailed with respect both to the amount in controversy and to the most significant issue presented in the proceeding, met the net worth requirements, and have not unreasonably protracted the Court proceedings. Discussion 1(...continued) indicated.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011