- 7 - every case, and no one factor is controlling. See Abramson v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 360, 371 (1986); Allen v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 28, 34 (1979); sec. 1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners state that at the time the notice of deficiency was issued,3 "there was no reasonable factual basis to support [respondent's] determination that petitioners did not engage in the business of horse racing and breeding with an intent to make a profit." We disagree. Cases involving section 183 are almost entirely factual in nature and require a weighing of factors, all of which may be reasonably interpreted differently. See Brennan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-60; Eldridge v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-44; Harrison v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995- 295; Leaphart v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-502, affd. without published opinion 31 F.3d 1172 (3d Cir. 1994); Jasienski v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-449. In the underlying case, we were required to weigh carefully all the facts and circumstances and consider each of the factors listed in the regulations promulgated under section 183. Although we agreed with petitioners in the underlying case, there were certain factors present that were indicative of an activity not engaged in for profit. Notwithstanding our conclusion that petitioners did have the requisite profit objective, the presence 3Respondent's position in the administrative proceeding was the same as in the judicial proceeding. This is immaterial, however, since petitioners do not seek administrative costs.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011