Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         

          Introduction                                                                
               These consolidated cases are part of a group of more than              
          1,300 remaining cases--more than 500 cases have settled--arising            
          from respondent's disallowance of interest deductions claimed by            
          participants in various tax shelter programs promoted by Henry              
          F.K. Kersting (Mr. Kersting).  The Kersting group of cases                  
          (hereinafter the Kersting project) was assigned to Judge                    
          William A. Goffe (Judge Goffe) for disposition.  By agreement of            
          the parties and the Court, the merits of the Kersting programs              
          were to be litigated in a consolidated trial of 14 docketed cases           
          of eight petitioners that had been designated as "test cases".              
          The vast majority of the remaining Kersting project petitioners             
          signed stipulations to be bound (sometimes referred to herein as            
          piggyback agreements) in which they agreed with respondent that             
          their cases would be resolved in accordance with the Court's                
          opinion in the test cases.                                                  
          Before the trial of the test cases, some test case                          
          petitioners argued that a 1981 search of Mr. Kersting's office              
          had been illegal, that materials seized during the search should            
          be suppressed in the test case proceedings, and that the burden             
          of proof and burden of going forward with evidence should be                
          shifted to respondent.  In Dixon v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 237               
          (1988) (Dixon I), the Court held, in an opinion by Judge Goffe,             
          that the petitioners had failed to establish standing to contest            
          the Kersting search and seizure.                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011