- 6 - By letter dated February 29, 1996, respondent mailed to petitioners proposed stipulations of fact. Respondent's letter read, in part: In considering what additional documents would be helpful to resolve these matters, bear in mind that you have to provide to the Court's satisfaction that you paid each of the items disallowed by the Internal Revenue Service and that these represent deductible expenses, that is, that there was a valid business purpose. Generally, source documents such as cancelled checks, invoices and contemporaneously maintained notes will help corroborate oral testimony. Travelling expenses, including meals and lodging while away from home, are subject to a more rigorous substantiation requirement under I.R.C. � 274. These expenses require what is referred to as "adequate records" or by "sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayers own statement" concerning (1) the amount of the expense; (2) the time and place of the travel; (3) the business purpose of the expense; and (4) the business relationship to the taxpayer of persons entertained. I.R.C. � 274(d). To guide you, we have enclosed pertinent excerpts from the I.R.C. � 274 regulations. Concerning the proposed l0% tax for the individual retirement account distribution under I.R.C. � 72(t), you are correct in that one of the exceptions is where the distributions are part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (not less frequently than annually) made over the life expectancy of the employee of the joint lives of the employee and a designated beneficiary. I.R.C. � 72(t)(2)(A)(iv). In order to review this issue, we need documents reflecting the transfer of funds into the Twentieth Century and Donald, Lufkin & Jenrette accounts which established the individual retirement accounts, worksheets that you prepared (or an explanation) concerning your determination of the period over which the periodic payments would be made and the statements reflecting the periodic payments that were made from the date first made to the present. In this regard, please note that under I.R.C. � 72(t)(4), if the distributions are modified in the first five years such that I.R.C. � 72(t)(2)(A)(iv) no longer applies, then the tax (plus interest) retroactively applies. I.R.C. � 72(t)(4)(A). We need to see the documents between 1993 and the present to ensure that the distributions still qualify for the exception. For your consideration, enclosed is a copy of Notice 89-25, 1989-1 C.B. 662 which discussesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011