- 3 -
FINDINGS OF FACT
The parties filed a stipulation of facts with attached
exhibits. The facts reflected therein are so found, and, by this
reference, are incorporated herein. Petitioner is a certified
public accountant. He resided in Staten Island, New York, when
the petition herein was filed.
The University of Chicago Litigation
In 1981, petitioner began filing lawsuits against the
University of Chicago, IBM Corp., Ernst & Whinney, and Weiner &
Co. alleging employment discrimination. In each of the
proceedings, the trial court ruled against petitioner, and the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.1
On June 5, 1989, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of New York ordered its Clerk not to accept future
filings made by petitioner against the University of Chicago, IBM
Corp., Ernst & Whinney, and Weiner & Co., unless a U.S.
1 See Golub v. Ernst & Whinney, 779 F.2d 38 (2d Cir. 1985),
cert. denied 476 U.S. 1178 (1986); Golub v. University of
Chicago, 876 F.2d 890 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Golub
v. IBM Corp., 495 U.S. 941 (1990); Golub v. IBM Corp., 888 F.2d
1376 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied 495 U.S. 941 (1990); Golub v.
Ernst & Whinney, 891 F.2d 277 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied sub
nom. Golub v. IBM Corp., 495 U.S. 941 (1990); Golub v. Ernst &
Whinney, IBM Corp., University of Chicago, Weiner & Co., Docket
No. 89-7460 (2d Cir. Nov. 2, 1989); Golub v. Weiner & Co., 896
F.2d 543 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied sub nom. Golub v. IBM
Corp., 495 U.S. 941 (1990); Golub v. Ernst & Whinney; IBM Corp.,
University of Chicago, Weiner & Co., Docket Nos. 90-7180 and 90-
7496 (2d Cir. Jan. 7, 1991).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011