Vernon W. Hartman, Jr. and Virginia M. Hartman - Page 13




                                        - 13 -                                         

                  of facts as directed by the Court.  Petitioners                      
                  never responded to the stipulation sent by                           
                  respondent on September 12, 1997 and November 10,                    
                  1997.                                                                

             Because both petitioners appeared for trial through their                 
             attorney, the Court denied respondent's motion to dismiss                 
             for lack of prosecution, and the case went to trial.                      
             Petitioners failed to submit a trial memorandum as directed               
             by the Court's standing pretrial order issued in this case,               
             and petitioners' attorney made no opening statement.                      
                  At trial, Mr. Hartman was the only witness called to                 
             testify.  Petitioners submitted a handwritten summary of                  
             Mr. Hartman's travel schedule during the years in issue,                  
             two contracts with the Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc.               
             (Met), and a letter from the Met itemizing Mr. Hartman's                  
             "performance and coverage schedule for the 1987/88 season".               
             Mr. Hartman's testimony and the other evidence presented by               
             petitioners failed to substantiate any of the deductions                  
             disallowed in the notice of deficiency.                                   
                  At the conclusion of the trial, the Court directed the               
             parties to file simultaneous posttrial opening and reply                  
             briefs.  This was to allow the parties the opportunity to                 
             explain their positions regarding the documents and the                   
             testimony presented at trial.  Petitioners failed to file a               
             posttrial brief.                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011