Vernon W. Hartman, Jr. and Virginia M. Hartman - Page 15




                                        - 15 -                                         

                  In this case, we could hold petitioners in default,                  
             pursuant to Rule 123(a) and dismiss the case for their                    
             failure to respond to orders of the Court and for their                   
             failure to file briefs under Rule 151.  See Stringer v.                   
             Commissioner, 84 T.C. 693 706-708 (1985), affd. without                   
             published opinion 789 F.2d 917 (4th Cir. 1986).  We could                 
             also assume that, after trial, petitioners concluded that                 
             their petition was not meritorious and they abandoned their               
             claims.  See Calcutt v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. 716, 721-722                
             (1985).  In that event, we would not dismiss the case by                  
             reason of petitioners' failure to comply with the Court's                 
             orders and Rules, but we would decide the case against                    
             petitioners by reason of their failure to satisfy their                   
             burden of proof.  See id.  On either theory the result is                 
             the same.  We must sustain the adjustments determined in                  
             the notice of deficiency.                                                 
                  On the basis of the history of this case, including                  
             petitioners' failure or refusal to provide the Court with                 
             a statement of the issues for decision, we find that the                  
             proceedings have been instituted or maintained by                         
             petitioners primarily for delay and that petitioners'                     
             position in the proceeding is frivolous or groundless.                    
             Accordingly, we will require petitioners to pay to the                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011