H Group Holding, Inc. and Subsidiaries - Page 72




                                        - 58 -                                         

               (4) Net management income from HHK and HS to HIC for                    
          services provided by HIC.13                                                  
               In controversy are Hyatt Domestic’s taxable years ending                
          January 31, 1980, through January 31, 1988, and HIC’s taxable                
          years ending December 31, 1976, through December 31, 1983.                   
          III.  Section 482--Background                                                
               Under section 482, the Commissioner has broad authority to              
          prevent the artificial shifting of income and to allocate income             
          among commonly controlled corporations in order to place them on             
          a parity with uncontrolled, unrelated taxpayers.  See Seagate                
          Tech., Inc., & Consol. Subs. v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 149, 163              
          (1994); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 226, 352-353               
          (1991); see also Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Commissioner, 92 T.C.                
          525, 581 (1989), affd. 933 F.2d 1084 (2d Cir. 1991); Edwards v.              
          Commissioner, 67 T.C. 224, 230 (1976); sec. 1.482-1(b)(1), Income            
          Tax Regs.  A business purpose for an arrangement or a set of                 
          transactions does not by itself insulate a taxpayer from a                   
          section 482 allocation.  See Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner,               
          supra at 353.                                                                


               13  In the deficiency notices, respondent determined                    
          allocations from Hyatt of Panama to HIC for both trade names and             
          marks and management services.  Respondent’s trial position                  
          included only allocations from the HHK and HS.  Because                      
          respondent no longer relies on or advocates the notice                       
          determination on this aspect, we treat respondent’s abandonment              
          of the allocations from Hyatt of Panama as a concession of these             
          adjustments.                                                                 




Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011