Helen C. Hopkinson - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                          

          By stipulation, respondent conceded a portion of the deficiency              
          as determined in the statutory notice of deficiency.                         
               The amount unreported income remaining in dispute for 1993              
          is $20,721.81, which includes $12,000 paid by petitioner's former            
          husband as attorney's fees pursuant to paragraphs 4.01 and 11.01             
          of the settlement agreement and $8,721.81 paid by petitioner's               
          former husband as tuition pursuant to paragraph 5.01 of the                  
          settlement agreement.  The $8,721.81 tuition payment includes                
          $3,520 paid as tuition directly to Oglethorpe University on                  
          behalf of petitioner and $5,201.81 paid to petitioner to                     
          reimburse her for tuition and college expenses she paid                      
          personally.                                                                  
               The amount of unreported income remaining in dispute for                
          taxable year 1994 is $23,691.41, which includes $12,000 paid by              
          petitioner's former husband as attorney's fees pursuant to                   
          paragraphs 4.01 and 11.01 of the settlement agreement and                    
          $11,694.41 paid as tuition pursuant to paragraph 5.01 of the                 
          settlement agreement.  The $11,694.41 tuition payment includes               
          $8,678.50 paid as tuition directly to Oglethorpe University on               
          behalf of petitioner and $3,015.91 paid to petitioner to                     
          reimburse her for tuition and college expenses she paid                      
          personally.                                                                  
               Respondent further determined that petitioner was liable,               
          pursuant to section 6662(a), for an accuracy-related penalty in              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011