- 485 - limited recourse obligations, the payor was personally liable only for the interest and principal under the note due during the times, and only during the times, and in the amounts and only to the extent of such amounts, as set forth in schedule A thereto, without giving effect to the deferred payments, if any. Under this provision, recourse obligations were determined as of the date and occurrence of default. Under schedule A, the maximum amount of recourse obligation as of January 1, 1988, was zero. The balance of the obligation was nonrecourse, and the payee looked only to the collateral for payment. The purchase agreement between Pluto and Cedilla Invest. was made pursuant to a certificate of resolutions of the corporations' board of directors attested to by Meyers. On December 30, 1979, Funding International purportedly agreed to a collateral assignment of the lease with respect to the computer leasing equipment to Cedilla Invest., subject to the leases of Funding International. The result of the assignment was that Cedilla Invest. received the payments under the existing leases from the end users. In December 1979, Cedilla Invest. and Funding International entered into an agreement of lease and a remarketing agreement regarding the computer leasing equipment. The term of the lease between Cedilla Invest. and Funding International was through December 31, 1988. Under the lease, the lessee could replace equipment subject thereto.Page: Previous 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011