- 509 - The expected return of an investor in equipment leasing transactions is rent and residual value at the end of the lease term with the lessee, here generally 108 months. In contrast to Friendship Dairies, Inc., there were no tax spreadsheets, appraisals, or accounting letters presented by IRA to support a claim of expected residual value which could produce a profit. The Court has not been provided with any projections of residual value or useful life, which certainly would be present in an objective economic analysis. As in Friendship Dairies, there is no persuasive evidence of any motivation for the transactions, other than obtaining tax benefits. The benefits herein (enormous interest and depreciation deductions and credits) were primarily designed to "shelter" the money reported as income by IRA from Kanter's Prudential scheme. Kanter testified he did not make a specific economic analysis of the transactions. He relied on Mallin, his friend and the promoter/broker of the deals, without any independent evidence that the deals had economic substance. Mallin's credibility is obviously tainted based on his relationship to Kanter and his affiliated entities. He was not an independent outsider. As in Friendship Dairies, the witnesses presented on behalf of IRA in this case were obviously biased, and their testimonyPage: Previous 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011