Irv C. Jaffe - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         

                    (A) such payment is received by (or on behalf of)                 
               a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument,                     
                    (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not                 
               designate such payment as a payment which is not                       
               includible in gross income under this section and not                  
               allowable as a deduction under section 215,                            
                    (C) in the case of an individual legally separated                
               from his spouse under a decree of divorce or of                        
               separate maintenance, the payee spouse and the payor                   
               spouse are not members of the same household at the                    
               time such payment is made, and                                         
                    (D) there is no liability to make any such payment                
               for any period after the death of the payee spouse and                 
               there is no liability to make any payment (in cash or                  
               property) as a substitute for such payments after the                  
               death of the payee spouse.                                             

          Thus, the subject $18,500 received by Ms. Jaffe during 1994                 
          constitutes alimony, deductible by Mr. Jaffe and includable in              
          Ms. Jaffe's gross income, only if all four criteria of section              
          71(b)(1) are met.                                                           
               Respondent took the position that the $18,500 in withdrawals           
          by Ms. Jaffe did not constitute alimony, and, therefore, such               
          amounts were not includable in her gross income and,                        
          correspondingly, were not deductible by Mr. Jaffe.  Respondent              
          based this position on two grounds.  First, there was no                    
          definitive characterization of the withdrawals in the agreed                
          order of September 4, 1992.  The agreed order stated that such              
          amounts "ultimately determined to be payable as alimony pendente            
          lite will be credited against defendant's [Mr. Jaffe] share at              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011