- 6 - shareholders to claim basis. See, e.g., Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner, 875 F.2d 420, 422 (4th Cir. 1989), affg. 90 T.C. 206 (1988); Underwood v. Commissioner, 535 F.2d 309, 311 (5th Cir. 1976), affg. 63 T.C. 468 (1975). In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner had a zero basis in the redeemed stock. Petitioner testified that he had a basis of $25 per share or a total of $5,225 and $1,025 for the shares redeemed in 1993 and 1994, respectively. In an attempt to substantiate his basis in the redeemed securities, petitioner submitted a copy of a certificate issued by the Citizens Federal Bank. The certificate shows that petitioner owned 163 shares of Citizens Federal Stock, that the stock was 8 percent Series C Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, and that the stock's par value was $.01. Additionally, petitioner submitted a copy of a letter from the Citizens Federal Bank declaring its intent to redeem some of its outstanding shares from shareholders. This letter indicates that the redemption price of the stock was 101 percent of the preference value, or $25.25 per share. Petitioner did not submit any other evidence to support his claimed basis in the redeemed shares of stock. Petitioner's testimony regarding the purchase of the stock at issue was vague. In fact, he was unable to provide any details regarding his purchase of the stock other than the claimed $25 per share purchase price that he surmised from thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011