- 13 - sustained. Nothing in the above-cited language supports the netting of expenses against gross income to determine whether or not income tax returns were required to be filed for the years in question. Petitioner was required to file income tax returns for 1993 and 1994. He has failed to show that the failure to file was due to reasonable cause and was not due to willful neglect. Petitioner, therefore, is liable for the failure-to-file addition to tax under section 6651(a). Therefore, respondent's determination on this issue is sustained. 5. Sec. 6654(a) Addition to tax for Failure to pay Estimated tax Respondent determined the addition to tax under section 6654(a) for failure to make estimated tax payments for 1993. Section 6654(a) provides for an addition to tax "in the case of any underpayment of estimated tax by an individual". There is no exception contained therein relating to reasonable cause and lack of willful neglect. Subject to certain exceptions provided by statute and not pertinent here, this addition to tax is otherwise automatic if the amounts of the withholdings and estimated tax payments do not equal statutorily designated amounts. See Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 222 (1992). Petitioner produced no evidence to show that respondent's determination of his liability for the addition to tax underPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011