Robert John Kayian, Transferee - Page 33

                                       - 33 -                                         

                    debtor.  [Fla. Stat. Ann. sec. 726.105(1) and                     
               The language of the Florida fraudulent transfer statute                
          makes it clear that, in determining whether a transfer is made              
          with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor            
          of the debtor (fraudulent intent), we may consider factors                  
          (badges of fraud) other than those set forth in Fla. Stat. Ann.             
          sec. 726.105(2)(a) through (k).  See Fla. Stat. Ann. sec.                   
          726.105(2); see also General Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials                 
          Handling Corp., 119 F.3d 1485, 1498 (11th Cir. 1997).  Moreover,            
          in determining whether a transfer is made with a fraudulent                 
          intent, we must "take into account 'the particular facts sur-               
          rounding the conveyance,' and avoid determining in a vacuum the             
          presence or absence of a debtor's actual intent to hinder or                
          delay a creditor."  Id. at 1498-1499 (quoting Kirk v. Edinger,              
          380 So. 2d 1336, 1337 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)).  Furthermore,            
          although a "single badge of fraud may only create a suspicious              
          circumstance and may not constitute the requisite fraud to set              
          aside a conveyance, * * * several of them when considered to-               
          gether may afford a basis to infer fraud."  Id. at 1498 (quoting            
          Johnson v. Dowell, 592 So. 2d 1194, 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.               
          1992)).  We have recognized that                                            
                    In Florida, existing creditors have the benefit of                
               a presumption of fraudulent intent where the conveyance                
               is voluntary [i.e., for no consideration] and there is                 

Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011