David and Barbara Kincaid - Page 8




                                        - 8 -8                                        
          liable for income tax deficiencies for 1982 and 1979,                       
          respectively.  Petitioners contend that the period from 1979, the           
          earlier year in issue, to 1995, when respondent issued the                  
          notices of deficiency, was simply too long.  As to the FPAA sent            
          on June 4, 1990, petitioners also contend that respondent’s                 
          employees had a ministerial duty to send an FPAA in the Encoder             
          case to Signature, and that respondent cannot prove that                    
          respondent mailed it to the correct address.                                
               We disagree because petitioners’ arguments relate to the               
          time before May 30, 1995.  The Commissioner may not abate                   
          interest that accrues before the Commissioner first contacts the            
          taxpayer in writing with respect to the deficiency or payment of            
          tax.  Sec. 6404(e) (flush language); Krugman v. Commissioner,               
          supra at 239.  Respondent first contacted petitioners in writing            
          about the additions to tax for 1979 and 1982 in the notices of              
          deficiency for those years, sent on May 30 and June 5, 1995.                
          Thus, respondent’s refusal to abate interest before those dates             
          was not an abuse of discretion.  See sec. 6404(e) (flush                    
          language); Krugman v. Commissioner, supra.                                  
               In addition, based on the detailed testimony of respondent’s           
          lead project attorney for the EMS litigation, we find that none             
          of the delays before September 30, 1995, resulted from errors by            
          respondent's employees in performing a ministerial act.                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011