- 7 - arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law. See Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999). When enacting section 6404(e), Congress intended for the Commissioner to abate interest "where failure to abate interest would be widely perceived as grossly unfair." H. Rept. 99-426, at 844 (1985), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1, 844; S. Rept. 99-313, at 208 (1986), 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) 1, 208. Congress, however, did not intend that abatement "be used routinely to avoid payment of interest." Id. This is our first occasion to decide what constitutes a ministerial act for purposes of section 6404(e). Section 6404(e) does not define what is meant by the term "ministerial act". The legislative history behind the enactment of section 6404(e) provides guidance to what Congress deemed to be a ministerial act. The House Ways and Means Committee report (House report) and the Senate Finance Committee report (Senate report) state: the term "ministerial act" [should] be limited to nondiscretionary acts where all of the preliminary prerequisites, such as conferencing and review by supervisors, have taken place. Thus, a ministerial act is a procedural action, not a decision in a substantive area of tax law. * * * [H. Rept. 99-426, supra at 845, 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) at 845; S. Rept. 99-313, supra at 209, 1986-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) at 209.] The House report and the Senate report also provide examples of what constitutes a delay in performing a ministerial act. The House report states:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011