William Grant Lee - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
               B.  Granting of Innocent Spouse Relief                                 
               Petitioner also contends that respondent's grant of innocent           
          spouse relief to his former wife Vida Lee was a ministerial                 
          error.                                                                      
               Generally, a husband and wife may file a joint return, and,            
          where they do so, they are jointly and severally liable for tax.            
          See sec. 6013(d)(3).  Former section 6013(e) set out four                   
          requirements which, if met, provided relief for the so-called               
          innocent spouse from joint and several liability.6  Respondent's            
          determination of whether these requirements were met required the           
          exercise of judgment and discretion by respondent and thus could            
          not be a ministerial act.                                                   
               C.  Misinformation and Lack of Information                             
               Petitioner contends that respondent committed several                  
          ministerial errors due to respondent's failure to communicate               
          relevant information and respondent's communication of                      
          misinformation to petitioner.                                               

               5(...continued)                                                        
          v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 12 n.27 (1970).                                      
               6  Former sec. 6013(e)(1) provided innocent spouse relief              
          where:  (1)  A joint Federal income tax return was filed for the            
          year in issue; (2) there was a substantial understatement of tax            
          on that return attributable to grossly erroneous items of the               
          other spouse; (3) in signing the income tax return, the claimed             
          innocent spouse did not know or have reason to know of the                  
          substantial understatement; and (4) it would be inequitable to              
          hold the claimed innocent spouse liable for the deficiency in               
          question.                                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011