- 9 - travel by subway to her home carrying cash ranging from $350 to $800. Mr. Margolis would then travel back to Manhattan on the following Monday to deposit 95 to 100 percent of the cash to petitioners' account at National Westminster Bank, also located in the Empire State Building. Apparently petitioners' reason for this practice was so that they would have cash available for their weekend expenditures. We have reviewed petitioners' bank account statements and find that petitioners' testimony is not supported by their banking pattern. For instance, a number of the deposits claimed to be deposits of cashed checks are in the amount of $514. However, upon review of the record, it appears that the $514 deposits are actually deposits of unemployment compensation received by Mrs. Margolis. Respondent gave petitioners credit for Mrs. Margolis' unemployment compensation in the bank deposits analysis. According to petitioners' 1992 return, Mrs. Margolis received $13,621 in unemployment compensation during that year. Based on the record, it appears that she received an initial 1 week payment of $257 ($514 � 2) on January 6, 1992 (supported on the record by a deposit of $257 to petitioners' account on that day) and 26 biweekly payments of $514, making a total of $13,621 for that year. Thus, the $514 deposits are in fact deposits of unemployment compensation and not deposits of the proceeds of Mrs. Margolis' cashed checks.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011