Cheryl J. Miller - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

               (2) whether any part of "unallocated child support and                 
          maintenance" payments made pursuant to a State court decree                 
          constitutes child support under section 71(c).3                             
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts and certain exhibits have been stipulated            
          pursuant to Rule 91.  The parties' stipulations of fact are                 
          incorporated herein by reference and are found as facts in these            
          cases.                                                                      
               Petitioners Cheryl J. Miller and John H. Lovejoy resided in            
          Colorado during the years in issue and when the petitions in                
          these consolidated cases were filed.                                        
               Petitioners were married on August 30, 1970.  They had two             
          children during their marriage--Krista Holly Lovejoy (Krista),              
          born on January 8, 1977, and Dean Ross Lovejoy (Dean), born on              
          May 10, 1980 (the children).                                                
               In May 1992, petitioners separated.  Ms. Miller remained in            
          the family home, and Mr. Lovejoy moved into a separate residence.           
          Mr. Lovejoy and Ms. Miller maintained separate residences                   
          throughout 1993 and 1994 and were not members of the same                   
          household at any time during those years.                                   


               3The only other issues raised by the notices of deficiency             
          or the pleadings require a determination of which petitioner is             
          entitled to claim the dependency exemptions for the minor                   
          children for the years at issue or are computational.  The                  
          dependency exemption issue will be addressed separately if it is            
          not resolved by agreement of the parties.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011