- 5 -
Orders did not specify what portion, if any, of the "unallocated
child support and maintenance" payments (unallocated family
support payments) constituted child support. The Temporary
Orders did not include any contingencies related to the children
that would reduce or terminate the payments or any portion
thereof.
On January 24, 1994, nunc pro tunc November 12, 1993, the
State court entered orders (the Permanent Orders) granting Ms.
Miller sole custody of the children. The Permanent Orders also
provided:
CHILD SUPPORT
For purposes of calculating child support
according to the guidelines, the Court finds that
* * * [Mr. Lovejoy's] gross income is $8,500.00 per
month.
* * * * * * *
The Court further finds that * * * [Ms. Miller's]
gross income is $571.00 per month, with her net monthly
income being $404.00. * * * [Ms. Miller's] income for
1987 was over $60,000, for 1988, $51,000, for 1989,
$74,000, for 1990 $28,000, 1991, $6,000, and 1992,
$12,000. The Court also finds that * * * [Ms. Miller]
received for each of those years, except 1992, a
director's fee of $3,000.00.
The Court further finds that * * * [Ms. Miller's]
health problems and those of the minor child, Dean,
have affected her ability to work more hours and
increase her income, and the Court believes that the
conclusion of this divorce action will aid in improving
her health problems and those of the minor child,
thereby freeing up * * * [Ms. Miller's] time to work
more hours and increase her income * * *. The Court,
accordingly, imputes income to * * * [Ms. Miller] of
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011