Eddie Mills, Jr. - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         

          the burden of proving that he provided over one-half of a                   
          dependent's support for any year for which the taxpayer claims an           
          exemption.  See Seraydar v. Commissioner, 50 T.C. 756, 760                  
          (1968).  In the absence of credible evidence regarding the total            
          amount of support received by each claimed dependent from all               
          sources during the taxable year, a taxpayer cannot be said to               
          have carried the burden of proving that he provided more than               
          one-half that amount.  See Blanco v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 512,             
          514 (1971); Stafford v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 515, 518 (1966).              
          It was respondent's position that petitioner had not shown that             
          he had contributed over half the support of his niece and one               
          nephew.                                                                     
               In the motion for litigation and administrative costs, it is           
          alleged that before the issuance of the notice of deficiency,               
          petitioner made an "attempt to submit the necessary                         
          substantiation as requested by the examination letter."  It is              
          also alleged that additional documentation was submitted and,               
          apparently, ignored.  Petitioner fails, however, to advise either           
          the Court or respondent as to the nature of the substantiation              
          allegedly submitted.                                                        
               Exhibit 2 to petitioner's representative's letter of                   
          October 30, 1996 (attached to respondent's notice of objection to           
          petitioner's motion), is described in the letter as a document              
          submitted during the examination of the return.  It is a copy of            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011