Eddie Mills, Jr. - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         

          care to her three resident grandchildren".  The Schedule C shows            
          a business expense of $2,416 for food and $212 for "fast food".             
          The record does not indicate how, if at all, these expenses                 
          figure in any of petitioner's support computations.                         
               Eventually, on December 18, 1996, petitioner submitted a               
          more detailed "Dependency Support Worksheet" with some additional           
          and some different figures (still without substantiation) from              
          those originally submitted in the letter of October 30, 1996.               
          The case was settled 2 days later.                                          
               We find in this case that respondents's position denying               
          deductions for dependency exemptions was reasonable in fact and             
          in law.                                                                     
          Head of Household Filing Status                                             
               Individuals who qualify as heads of households have special            
          tax rates applied to their taxable income.  See sec. 1(b).  As              
          relevant here, in order to qualify for head of household                    
          treatment, a taxpayer must maintain a household which for more              
          than one-half of the taxable year is the principal place of abode           
          of a dependent of the taxpayer.  See sec. 2(b)(1)(A)(ii).                   
               We have found that respondent's position that petitioner had           
          no dependents for the taxable year was reasonable.  Because                 
          petitioner would be eligible for head of household filing status            
          only if, among other requirements, his niece and nephew were his            
          dependents, it follows that respondent's position that petitioner           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011