Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries, Successor in Interest to Davenport Bank and Trust Company and Subsidiaries - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         

          and expenses and (2) legal fees and expenses related to advice              
          given to the taxpayer and its board on their legal rights and               
          obligations with respect to the transaction, the participation in           
          negotiations, the preparation of documents, and the preparation             
          of a request for a ruling from the Commissioner on the tax-free             
          acquisition plan.  We agreed.  We found that it was in the                  
          taxpayer's long-term interest to shift ownership of its stock to            
          the acquirer.  See National Starch & Chem. Corp. v. Commissioner,           
          93 T.C. 67 (1989), affd. 918 F.2d 426 (3d Cir. 1990), affd. sub             
          nom. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79 (1992).  We                 
          stated that the expenses were capitalizable because they were               
          incurred incident to a shift in ownership the benefits of "`which           
          could be expected to produce returns for many years in the                  
          future.'"  Id. at 75 (quoting E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v.              
          United States, 432 F.2d 1052, 1059 (3d Cir. 1970)).                         
               Our holding was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for              
          the Third Circuit, which rejected the taxpayer's argument, based            
          on Commissioner v. Lincoln Sav. & Loan Association, supra at 354,           
          that the expenses were not capitalizable because they did not               
          create or enhance a separate and distinct asset.  See National              
          Starch & Chem. Corp. v. Commissioner, 918 F.2d at 428-433.  The             
          Supreme Court also rejected this argument.  The Court stated that           
          Lincoln Savings stands merely for the proposition that an expense           
          must be capitalized under section 263(a)(1) when it serves to               





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011