Estate of Ethel S. Nowell, Deceased, David A. Prechel, Personal Representative - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         

          is conferred on Mr. Prechel and Ms. Prechel only if the general             
          partners consent.                                                           
               Under the partnership agreements, the assignee of a general            
          partnership interest is a general partner with respect to such              
          assignment if "at the time of such * * * [assignment, the                   
          assignee] is otherwise a General Partner".  If the assignee of a            
          general partnership interest is not a general partner, the                  
          assignee will become a substitute general partner only if                   
          approved by a majority of the partners.  Because Mr. Prechel was            
          already a general partner in PFLP, the 408,000 general                      
          partnership units in PFLP assigned to him continued to be a                 
          general partnership interest.                                               
               Applying the Federal estate tax valuation principles to the            
          interests described above, the limited partnership interests must           
          be valued as "assignee" interests, and the general partnership              
          interest in PFLP distributed to Mr. Prechel must be valued as a             
          general partnership interest.  Determination of whether                     
          Mr. Prechel and Ms. Prechel will be treated as limited partners             
          of the respective partnerships can be made only by taking into              
          consideration whether the remaining general partners will consent           
          to their admission as limited partners, subjective factors that             
          cannot be taken into consideration under the objective standard             
          of the hypothetical seller/buyer analysis.  See Propstra v.                 
          United States, supra at 1252; Estate of Andrews v. Commissioner,            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011