- 15 - supra at 956; Kolom v. Commissioner, supra at 244. Thus, the limited partnership interests received by Mr. Prechel and Ms. Prechel must be valued as assignee interests. There are, however, no subjective factors to consider when determining whether Mr. Prechel will be a general partner with respect to the general partnership interest assigned to him. The partnership agreement automatically treats him as a general partner. Accordingly, the general partnership interest received by Mr. Prechel should be valued as a general partnership interest. No general partnership interests passed to Ms. Prechel. Petitioner's motion for partial summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part, and respondent's motion for partial summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011