- 105 - the tax liability that will result therefrom. [H. Rept. 179, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. (1924), 1939-1 C.B. (Part 2) 251; S. Rept. 398, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. (1924), 1939-1 C.B. (Part 2) 275.] Unlike the statutory provision at issue in Horn v. Commissioner, 968 F.2d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1992), neither the plain language of section 1001 nor its legislative history lends any support to the proposition that Congress intended to respect the tax consequences of sales or exchanges of property that lack economic substance. While it is true that Congress crafted section 1001 as a provision that would be broadly applicable to sales or exchanges of property, subject to specific statutory exceptions, Congress did not proscribe an analysis of the economic substance of a sale or exchange of property. Cf. Compaq Computer Corp. v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 17 (1999) (Rejecting the taxpayer’s argument that the foreign tax credit regime completely sets forth Congress’ intent as to allowable foreign tax credits and that an additional economic substance requirement was not intended by Congress). In this regard, it is important to recognize that the economic substance doctrine is not a judicially created exception to the general rule of section 1001(c), as petitioner implies, but rather is a "canon of statutory interpretation that statutes should not be read to create 'absurd results.'" Horn v. Commissioner, supra at 1239. Moreover, petitioner's position conflicts with long-standing Supreme Court precedent holding that the tax consequences ofPage: Previous 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011