Richard and Margaret Sherman - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         

               On May 6, 1993, petitioner was advised that his "open door"            
          request had been denied, and despite his objections, his employment         
          would be terminated on May 28, 1993.  IBM offered petitioner an             
          opportunity to participate in its Corporate Transition Program              
          (CTP), whereby petitioner would be entitled to receive the                  
          equivalent of 1-year's salary--$107,000--on the condition he                
          execute an appropriate release.                                             
               At this time, petitioner learned that IBM was hiring new,              
          younger attorneys (recent graduates or individuals about to                 
          graduate from law school).  Petitioner consulted an attorney who            
          advised him that he had a viable cause of action against IBM for            
          age discrimination.  Accordingly, petitioner refused to participate         
          in the CTP.                                                                 
               Negotiations between IBM representatives and petitioner                
          ensued.  During the course of these negotiations, petitioner                
          threatened to obtain an injunction against IBM to stop its layoff           
          program (at that time, IBM was laying off 30,000-40,000 employees).         
          On May 13, 1993, petitioner and IBM entered an agreement entitled           
          "Settlement Agreement and Release" (settlement agreement).  The             
          settlement agreement states in pertinent part:                              
                         WHEREAS, Mr. Sherman has made certain                        
                    allegations about the propriety and lawfulness                    
                    of his having been designated as a "surplus                       
                    employee" resulting in claims of physical and                     
                    mental injury and stress;                                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011