Richard and Margaret Sherman - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         

          of the claim is a factual inquiry.  See Robinson v. Commissioner,           
          102 T.C. 116, 127 (1994), affd. in part, revd. in part on another           
          ground and remanded 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir. 1995).                             
               In the statement appended to their 1993 return, petitioners            
          state that the $207,000 payment from IBM was in exchange for                
          petitioner's "release [of] all claims for age discrimination,               
          including those available pursuant to title VII of the Civil Rights         
          Act."  Subsequent to the filing of petitioner's 1993 return, the            
          Supreme Court in Commissioner v. Schleier, supra, in resolving a            
          conflict among the circuits, held that back pay and liquidated              
          damages recovered for age discrimination under the Age                      
          Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Pub. L. 90-202, 81  Stat.         
          602, currently codified at 29 U.S.C. secs. 621-634 (1994), are not          
          excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(2) because (1)            
          the statute does not sound in tort, and (2) no part of the recovery         
          is received on account of personal injuries or sickness.  (We note          
          that several years prior to rendering its opinion in Schleier, the          
          Supreme Court in United States v. Burke, supra, held that back pay          
          awarded in settlement of title VII claims is not excludable from            
          gross income under section 104(a)(2).)                                      
               In their petition that was filed after the Supreme Court               
          rendered its opinion in Schleier, petitioners assert that the               
          $207,000 payment was solely in settlement of petitioner's claim for         
          physical and mental injury.  They claim that petitioner had a cause         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011