William J. Tully - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          American Financial Services" (All American).  Petitioner alleged            
          that All American was a sole proprietorship in the business of              
          consulting.  On the Schedule C, petitioner listed his Social                
          Security number but omitted his employer identification number.             
          Petitioner understated his Schedule C gross receipts for the 1993           
          taxable year by $187,745.  In addition to understating his gross            
          receipts on the Schedule C, petitioner also overstated his                  
          exemptions and his standard deduction for married persons and               
          underreported his self-employment taxes.                                    
               A motion for partial summary judgment is appropriate "if the           
          pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions,             
          and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits,           
          if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material              
          fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law."               
          Rule 121(b).  The party opposing the motion cannot rest upon the            
          allegations or denials in the pleadings but must "set forth                 
          specific facts showing that there is * * * [a] genuine issue for            
          trial."  Rule 121(d).  "The moving party, however, bears the                
          burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material                
          fact, and factual inferences will be read in a manner most                  
          favorable to the party opposing summary judgment."  Marshall v.             
          Commissioner, supra at 271.                                                 
               "Fraud is defined as an intentional wrongdoing designed to             
          evade tax believed to be owing."  Petzoldt v. Commissioner, 92              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011