- 12 - THE COURT: The U.S. Tax Court. MR. TULLY: I was in U.S. Tax Court one – one day. Yes, one day in the last six, seven years, and I was never in Tax Court or in this Court prior to that. I've been in this Court one day, maybe two days, to pick up paperwork or something, but only one day for a hearing that lasted about four hours. That's my only experience in United States Tax Court or any court. In fact, however, petitioner has had extensive experience in the U.S. Tax Court. Petitioner appeared before the U.S. Tax Court, prior to his appearance in the instant case, either pro se or as an officer of certain charitable organizations, on nine different occasions. See Oliver Family Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-234; Hart Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-228; Resource Management Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-224; Share Network Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-216; Tamaki Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-166; Tate Family Found. v. Commissioner , T.C. Memo. 1999-165; Bowen Family Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-149; Tully v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-310; Oliver Family Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-220. Petitioner, moreover, is prosecuting the appeal of two of these cases before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and he prosecuted one case before a Federal District Court in Tully v. Kaply, 81 AFTR 2d 98-2125 (C.D. Cal. 1998). See Tate Family Found. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-165. Additionally, although petitioner is not licensed to practice law, he did attend law school.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011