-2- under section 6662(a)1 in the respective amounts of $851 and $1,751. The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner was in the trade or business of being an author during the years in issue; if so, (2) whether expenses that petitioner incurred are deductible as ordinary and necessary under section 162 and whether he has adequately substantiated under section 274(d) his travel expenses;2 and (3) whether petitioner is liable for penalties for negligence or substantial understatement of tax under section 6662(a). In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed petitioner's medical expense deduction for 1994 because of the increase in the amount of adjusted gross income determined. The correctness of this adjustment depends upon our resolution of the issues stated above. FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and second stipulation of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto and exhibits offered 1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated. 2Although respondent did not raise the substantiation issue under sec. 274 in the notice of deficiency or in the pleadings, it was tried by both parties and without objection by petitioner. See Rule 41(b)(1).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011