Ralph Louis Vitale, Jr. - Page 2




                                         -2-                                          
          under section 6662(a)1 in the respective amounts of $851 and                
          $1,751.                                                                     
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioner was in            
          the trade or business of being an author during the years in                
          issue; if so, (2) whether expenses that petitioner incurred are             
          deductible as ordinary and necessary under section 162 and                  
          whether he has adequately substantiated under section 274(d) his            
          travel expenses;2 and (3) whether petitioner is liable for                  
          penalties for negligence or substantial understatement of tax               
          under section 6662(a).  In the notice of deficiency, respondent             
          disallowed petitioner's medical expense deduction for 1994                  
          because of the increase in the amount of adjusted gross income              
          determined.  The correctness of this adjustment depends upon our            
          resolution of the issues stated above.                                      
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and second stipulation of facts,                   
          together with the exhibits attached thereto and exhibits offered            



               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect for the taxable years in issue, and all Rule references              
          are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless                
          otherwise indicated.                                                        
               2Although respondent did not raise the substantiation issue            
          under sec. 274 in the notice of deficiency or in the pleadings,             
          it was tried by both parties and without objection by petitioner.           
          See Rule 41(b)(1).                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011