-31- would do under the circumstances. See Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947 (1985). It includes the failure to make a reason- able attempt to comply with the Internal Revenue Code. See sec. 6662(c). In claiming deductions for expenses related to his writing activity, petitioner has failed to establish his entitlement to certain expenses. On the basis of the record, though, we are satisfied that petitioner's underpayment for 1993 was not due to negligence but, rather, solely to an honest misunderstanding of the law. Petitioner has demonstrated that he made a reasonable attempt to comply with the internal revenue laws. He had sought the advice of Internal Revenue Service representatives and of professional tax preparers on how to deduct expenses incurred as an author. Petitioner was a credible witness, and it is our opinion that he acted reasonably and in good faith. For these reasons, we decline to impose the negligence penalty for 1993. For 1994, the deficiency notice determined an accuracy- related penalty against petitioner for the substantial under- statement of income tax. Respondent did not pursue the matter at the trial or on brief, and we presume that respondent has aban- doned it. Accordingly, we hold for petitioner on this issue. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Last modified: May 25, 2011