Abraham and Dina Weiss - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         

          business does not impute a profit motive to its previous owners.            
          See Finoli v. Commissioner, supra at 716-718, 726.                          
               Additionally, other than Mr. Weiss' representation that he             
          provided accounting services for unspecified other cable                    
          television clients, there is no basis to assume that petitioners            
          have ever had any particular success in similar or dissimilar               
          activities.                                                                 
               The scant evidence presented indicates that petitioners                
          earned no profits whatsoever from their Oshtemo-Kalamazoo                   
          activities; they only incurred losses.  Petitioners' tax returns            
          indicate that they used these losses to offset taxable income               
          generated by Mr. Weiss' unrelated activities.  Finally, although            
          we doubt that considerations of personal pleasure entered into              
          petitioners' decision to engage in cable television activity, the           
          absence of such considerations does not appreciably aid                     
          petitioners' attempt to demonstrate a profit objective in that              
          activity.                                                                   
               Petitioners ultimately have failed to produce evidence                 
          showing that the Oshtemo-Kalamazoo activities were entered into             
          with the requisite profit motive.  Accordingly, we sustain                  
          respondent’s determination on this issue.                                   
          Economic Substance                                                          
               Respondent has also disallowed the claimed loss deductions             
          because of petitioners' asserted failure to show the necessary              
          attributes of ownership required to claim the Oshtemo-Kalamazoo             
          assets.  Instead, respondent asserts the partnership activities             

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011