Abraham Lincoln Opportunity Foundation - Page 7




                                         -7-                                          
          that petitioner does not have the capacity under the laws of the            
          State of Colorado to engage in litigation in the Court.  See                
          Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. sec. 7-26-120 (West 1990) (repealed 1998).            
          Accordingly, we conclude that this case must be dismissed for               
          lack of jurisdiction.  See Rule 60(c); Bloomington Transmission             
          Serv., Inc. v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 586 (1986); Dillman Bros.              
          Asphalt Co. v. Commissioner, 64 T.C. 793 (1975); Great Falls                
          Bonding Agency, Inc. v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 304 (1974).6                  
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              


                                             An appropriate order will be             
                                        entered.                                      




















               6See also Tezak Constr. Co. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1993-208.                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011