- 3 - 14. In summary, Mr. Chisum lacks the capacity to bring the instant suit directly on behalf of the trust because he is not the trustee. Additionally, Mr. Chisum lacks the capacity to represent the trustee or any other person in this proceeding because he is not an attorney and is not otherwise admitted to practice before this Court. * * * 15. Since the petition in this case was not brought by a party with proper capacity as required by the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, this case should be dis- missed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner filed an objection to respondent’s motion in which it asks the Court to deny that motion. Petitioner’s objection to respondent’s motion asserts in pertinent part: As there is a change in fiduciary simultaneous with this * * * Objection and the change in fiduciary answers the objection raised by the Respondent in the Motion to Dismiss, this Court cannot dismiss as set forth in Rule 60(a)(1), Rules of Practice and Proce- dure, United States Tax Court. Any further objections by the Respondent must be done either by an answer to the Petition or by other motions as set forth in Rule 36, Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Tax Court. The Court had the document submitted by petitioner that purported to be a change in fiduciary filed as petitioner’s “Motion to Substitute Party and to Change Caption”. Petitioner’s motion alleges in pertinent part: Notice is hereby given that John P. Wilde has been appointed as Co-Trustee of Bantam Domestic Trust along with Jimmy C. Chisum * * * and Prudent Man Trustee Co. has resigned * * *. John P. Wilde will be proceeding in his capacity as a Co-Trustee of an Expressed [sic] Trust. * * * Attached to petitioner’s motion are two documents, one of which is entitled “APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE” and thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011