- 8 - such ratification shall have the same effect as if the case had been properly brought by such party. * * * * * * * * * * (c) Capacity: * * * The capacity of a fiduciary or other representative to litigate in the Court shall be determined in accordance with the law of the juris- diction from which such person's authority is derived. The record is unclear as to whether petitioner was organized as a trust under the laws of Arizona or some other State, al- though the parties do not dispute that petitioner was carrying on business during its taxable year 1994 in the State of Arizona. At the hearing, Mr. Chisum asserted that the administration of the trust is governed by the laws of the State of Arizona and that the “sole jurisdiction or exclusive jurisdiction in determining the validity of the contract for trust and determin- ing the validity of the trustee party, * * * [is] in Superior Court of State of Arizona.” Assuming arguendo, as petitioner claims, that it is a trust, the administration of which is subject to the laws of the State of Arizona, under Arizona law, see Rule 60(c), a trustee has the power to commence litigation on behalf of a trust.4 See Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. sec. 14-7233.C.25. (West 1995). In the instant 4Assuming arguendo, as respondent claims upon information and belief, that petitioner is a trust, the administration of which is subject to the laws of the State of Indiana, under Indiana law, see Rule 60(c), a trustee has the power to commence litigation on behalf of a trust. See Ind. Code Ann. sec. 30-4-3- 3(a)(11) (Michie 1989).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011