Clifford E. Barbour, Jr. and Dorothy D. Barbour - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                          
               A. Requirements for a Judgment Under Section 7430                       
               A judgment for litigation costs incurred in connection with             
          a court proceeding may be awarded only if a taxpayer:  (1) Is the            
          "prevailing party"; (2) has exhausted his or her administrative              
          remedies within the IRS; and (3) did not unreasonably protract               
          the court proceeding.  See sec. 7430(a), (b)(1), (3).                        
               A taxpayer must satisfy each of the respective requirements             
          in order to be entitled to an award of litigation costs under                
          section 7430.  See Rule 232(e).  Upon satisfaction of these                  
          requirements, a taxpayer may be entitled to reasonable costs                 
          incurred in connection with the court proceeding.  See sec.                  
          7430(a)(2), (c)(1).                                                          
               To be a prevailing party, the taxpayer must establish that              
          he or she has substantially prevailed with respect to either the             
          amount in controversy or the most significant issue or set of                
          issues presented and satisfy the applicable net worth                        
          requirement.  See sec. 7430(c)(4)(A); Rule 232(e).                           
              Respondent contends that petitioner has not satisfied the               
          requirements of section 7430(c)(4)(A); i.e, that he has not                  



               6(...continued)                                                         
          before Aug. 5, 1997 (Specifically, most of the amendments made by            
          RRA 1998 apply only to costs incurred more than 180 days after               
          July 22, 1998, and certain amendments made by RRA 1998 apply                 
          retroactively to Aug. 5, 1997.)  The petition herein was filed on            
          February 20, 1997, and petitioner has not claimed costs incurred             
          more than 180 days after July 22, 1998.  The amendments made by              
          TRA and RRA 1998 therefore do not apply in the present case.                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011