Busbee, Tommy W. and Pamela L. - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          affd. without published opinion 647 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1981).               
               Greater weight is given to objective facts than to a                   
          taxpayer's mere statement of intent.  See Dreicer v.                        
          Commissioner, 78 T.C. 642, 645 (1982), affd. without opinion 702            
          F.2d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 1983).                                                 
               The regulations provide a list of relevant factors to                  
          consider in determining whether an activity is engaged in for               
          profit.  Those factors are:  (1) The manner in which the taxpayer           
          carried on the activity; (2) the expertise of the taxpayer or his           
          advisers; (3) the time and effort expended by the taxpayer in               
          carrying on the activity; (4) the expectation that the assets               
          used in the activity may appreciate in value; (5) the success of            
          the taxpayer in carrying on other similar or dissimilar                     
          activities; (6) the taxpayer's history of income or losses with             
          respect to the activity; (7) the amount of occasional profits, if           
          any, which are earned; (8) the financial status of the taxpayer;            
          and (9) elements of personal pleasure or recreation.  See sec.              
          1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.                                                
               No one factor is conclusive.  We do not reach a decision by            
          merely counting factors supporting each party's position.  See              
          Dunn v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 715, 720 (1978), affd. on another             
          issue 615 F.2d 578 (2d Cir. 1980).                                          
               Respondent does not contest that the claimed deductions were           
          incurred with respect to petitioners' fishing activity, but                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011