- 4 - leases entered into by the partnerships were not supported by economic substance, did not conform to industry norms, and precluded any realistic opportunity for profit. See id. at 169, 175. We sustained respondent's disallowance of the claimed losses and interest deductions relating to the taxpayers’ investments in the partnerships, and we imposed an increased interest rate under section 6621(c). Petitioners herein stipulate that the factual findings made in the Krause test case opinion with regard to the partnerships involved therein also apply to the activities of the Garfield and Cardinal limited partnerships. We treat this stipulation as an admission that the activities of the Garfield and Cardinal limited partnerships were not conducted at arm’s length, that they were not legitimate transactions with economic substance, and that they lacked a profit objective. Discussion As we explained in Vanderschraaf v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-306, affd. without published opinion 211 F.3d 1276 (9th Cir. 2000), it is well established that the issue under section 183 as to whether a partnership investment has associated with it economic substance and a profit objective is determined at the partnership level. See Pasternak v. Commissioner, 990 F.2d 893, 900 (6th Cir. 1993), affg. Donahue v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-181; Simon v. Commissioner, 830 F.2d 499, 507 (3d Cir.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011