Patty K. Copeland, a.k.a. Patty K. White - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          T.C. 74, 81 (1976), affd. per curiam 555 F.2d 634 (7th Cir.                 
          1977).  For these reasons, in analyzing the economic substance              
          and the profit objective of limited partnership investments, in             
          particular, individual actions of limited partners are not the              
          focus of the analysis.                                                      
               An analysis of the economic substance and the profit                   
          objective element at the partnership level under section 183 is             
          consistent with and follows the general rule of Federal                     
          partnership taxation that the treatment of partnership income,              
          loss, deduction, or credit items is to be determined at the                 
          partnership level.  See sec. 702(b); Podell v. Commissioner, 55             
          T.C. 429, 433 (1970) (citing Estate of Freeland v. Commissioner,            
          393 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1968), affg. T.C. Memo. 1966-283); sec.              
          1.702-1(b), Income Tax Regs.                                                
               Section 761(a) defines a partnership for Federal income tax            
          purposes essentially as a group, joint venture, or other                    
          unincorporated organization through which any business, financial           
          operation, or venture is carried on.  See also section 7701(a)(2)           
          and section 1.761-1(a), Income Tax Regs., under which the term              
          “partnership” is defined more broadly than the common-law meaning           
          of partnership.                                                             
               We discern no reason to deviate from the above partnership-            
          level approach merely because petitioners herein have conceded              
          the originally claimed partnership tax benefits and are now                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011