- 9 -
On August 3, 1995, based on the information that a basis of
settlement had been reached, we again continued the trial of this
case.
Settlement discussions and related procedures continued
until the expiration, on February 11, 1999, of the period
provided for in section 6224(c)(2) for partners to demand
consistent settlement agreements from respondent. Respondent
entered into consistent settlement agreements with some, but not
all, of the limited partners. Petitioner did not enter into a
settlement agreement.
On February 2, 1998, respondent and the participating
partners who remained active in the case (the remaining
participating partners) jointly moved to withdraw certain motions
and documents previously filed in this case (the motion to
withdraw), including the 1995 misconduct motion. The motion to
withdraw was granted on September 2, 1998.
On October 29, 1998, we allowed counsel for the remaining
participating partners to withdraw from the case.
On June 4, 1999, we set this case for trial at a special
session scheduled to commence on October 4, 1999 (the October 4
special trial session).
On July 2, 1999, petitioner made the misconduct motion (the
motion). We set the motion for an evidentiary hearing (the
hearing) at the October 4, 1999, special trial session. The
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011