- 15 - purportedly engaged in farming in Mexico. C.H.M. had entered into 10 farming contracts (the 10 contracts) with AMCOR. On February 14, 1988, Mr. Goolkasian was contacted by Mr. Frame, who identified himself as general counsel of AMCOR and asked about his investigation of the 10 contracts. Because of certain discrepancies in what Mr. Frame told him, Mr. Goolkasian became suspicious of Mr. Frame. Mr. Frame also represented Dodson and McCoy. On April 13, 1988, Mr. Goolkasian met with Mr. Frame in pursuit of his investigation of Dodson and McCoy, and, on June 20, 1988, he met Messrs. Frame, Dodson, and McCoy in pursuit of that investigation. Mr. Goolkasian believed that, at one or both of those meetings, Mr. Frame attempted to mislead him. As a result, Mr. Goolkasian grew suspicious. Mr. Goolkasian came to believe that there were one or more tax fraud conspiracies involving, variously, as conspirators, Dodson and McCoy, Mr. Frame, Barry Jones (an accountant for AMCOR), petitioner, Mr. Wright, Mr. Schreiber, and AMCOR. Mr. Goolkasian’s authority to investigate AMCOR was limited because its principal place of business was outside the district to which he was assigned, the San Jose district. By at least April 1988, Mr. Goolkasian had communicated his suspicions about AMCOR to personnel in the Laguna Niguel Examination Division. Mr. Goolkasian was instrumental in persuading personnel in the Laguna Niguel Examination Division to make the fraud referral.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011