Gabriel M. Daya, et al. - Page 12




                                        - 12 -                                        
          mother to deposit into the household account and for groceries.             
          Deposits into Morhaf’s checking account from January 1 through              
          December 5, 1995, totaled $29,888.63.  Of this amount, $14,625.94           
          of the deposits can be identified as Morhaf’s payroll checks from           
          Nordstrom.  In 1995, Morhaf deposited a $3,765 check from Fuad’s            
          Glendale Federal account written and signed by Mahmoud into his             
          checking account.  The sources of other deposits into Morhaf’s              
          checking account include unidentified Nordstrom paychecks and               
          funds repaid to Morhaf by friends and family for whom Morhaf had            
          purchased items using his credit and discount as an employee of             
          Nordstrom.  Disbursements from Morhaf’s checking account in 1995            
          totaled $26,119.81.  Of this amount, $1,776.13 was disbursed for            
          expenditures classified as “Utilities (Pacific Bell, etc.)”,                
          $668.74 was disbursed for “Household (Safeway, Lucky, etc.)”,               
          $1,096.07 was disbursed for “Transportation (Automobile)”, and              
          $131 was disbursed for “Medical & Dental”.7                                 
               The sole evidence regarding Morhaf’s checking account in 1996          
          is a summary of 14 checks drawn on the account and copies of the            
          checks.  These checks represent at least some of Morhaf’s                   



               7 These amounts are drawn from a “Summary of Account                   
          Disbursements” and copies of checks.  The summary was prepared              
          from bank statements covering periods from Dec. 7, 1994, through            
          Dec. 5, 1995.  Although we are unable to ascertain which payments           
          are included under the various categories in the summary,                   
          respondent has not reserved any objections to this summary.  We             
          thus accept the summary as fact.  Because the summary covers part           
          of 1994, we have, however, deducted payments made to Pacific Bell           
          in 1994 from the total listed under “Utilities” in the summary.             




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011