James E. and Shirley S. Deas - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
         See sec. 6662(a) and (b)(1).  For purposes of section 6662, the              
         term "negligence" includes any failure to make a reasonable                  
         attempt to comply with the provisions of the internal revenue                
         laws, a failure to exercise ordinary and reasonable care in the              
         preparation of a tax return, or a failure to keep adequate books             
         and records or to substantiate items properly.  Sec. 1.6662-                 
         3(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.  The term "disregard" includes any                 
         careless, reckless, or intentional disregard of rules or                     
         regulations.  Sec. 6662(c).                                                  
              Negligence is defined as a lack of due care or failure to do            
         what a reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would do under               
         the circumstances.  See Neely v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 934, 947              
         (1985) (quoting Marcello v. Commissioner, 380 F.2d 499, 506 (5th             
         Cir. 1967), affg. in part and remanding in part 43 T.C. 168                  
         (1964)).3  In determining whether petitioners were negligent in              
         failing to report the gain from the sale of the property, we take            
         into account petitioner's years of business experience.  See                 
         Sutor v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 64, 69 (1951); Glenn v.                       
         Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1995-399, affd. without published                   
         opinion 103 F.3d 129 (6th Cir. 1996).                                        


               3In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th              
          Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh                 
          Circuit, the court to which an appeal in this case would lie,               
          adopted as binding precedent all the decisions of the former                
          Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the             
          close of business on Sept. 30, 1981.                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011